Statistics · Hypothesis testing
1 / 8
Two-tailed tests
Carrying out a two-tailed binomial test (H1 : p ≠ p0), where a change in either direction counts as evidence. Splitting the significance level α into two tails of α/2, finding both critical regions and the actual significance level (the sum of the two tail probabilities), the equivalent p-value method (compare the observed tail with α/2, or 2× the tail with α), and writing a full conclusion in context.
Statistics · Hypothesis testing
Two-tailed tests
Carrying out a two-tailed binomial test (H1 : p ≠ p0), where a change in either direction counts as evidence. Splitting the significance level α into two tails of α/2, finding both critical regions and the actual significance level (the sum of the two tail probabilities), the equivalent p-value method (compare the observed tail with α/2, or 2× the tail with α), and writing a full conclusion in context.
Why it works
A two-tailed test asks whether a proportion has changed, with no direction specified, so . Evidence can come from the result being unusually high or low, so the significance level is split between the two tails — in each. A two-tailed test therefore uses at each end.Critical-region method. Assume , so .
- Lower critical value : the largest with .
- Upper critical value : the smallest with .
p-value method. Find which tail the observation is in — compare it with the expected value . If the observed is below , find ; if above, find . Compare that tail probability with (equivalently, double it to get the p-value and compare with ). If it is smaller, reject .
Two common slips. Compare the single tail with , not (or double the tail before comparing with ); and choose the tail by which side of the observation lies. As always, finish with a conclusion in context.