Number · Surds
1 / 10
Rationalising the denominator
Why multiplying top and bottom by the same thing changes nothing, how √a in a denominator is cleared by √a, and how a conjugate clears a two-term denominator like 3 + √5.
Number · Surds
Rationalising the denominator
Why multiplying top and bottom by the same thing changes nothing, how √a in a denominator is cleared by √a, and how a conjugate clears a two-term denominator like 3 + √5.
Why it works
"Rationalise the denominator" means: rewrite the fraction so no surd is left underneath. The tool is the most innocent fact in fractions: multiplying top and bottom by the same number multiplies the fraction by — the value doesn't change, only its appearance. (Multiplying only the bottom is not allowed: that genuinely changes the number.)One-term denominators: multiply by the surd itself. For , multiply top and bottom by :
The bottom worked because exactly. Always finish by simplifying — earns the method mark, but the final mark wants .
Two-term denominators: multiply by the conjugate. Multiplying by itself does not clear the surd — still contains . What clears it is the conjugate, the same pair with the opposite sign, because conjugates make a difference of two squares:
So for , multiply top and bottom by :
Why bother? Partly convention, but mostly usefulness: a rational denominator makes fractions comparable and addable, and in the exam the target form " where and are integers" forces the conjugate method — you cannot reach that form without it. Expect the answer to collapse neatly; these questions are engineered so the denominator becomes a small whole number. If yours becomes or something ugly, check the conjugate's sign.
Sense-check exact answers. : as decimals, and . ✓ A ten-second decimal check catches most slips.