Pure · Differentiation
1 / 10
The product rule
Differentiating a product of two functions, y = uv, as u'v + uv' — why the naive "differentiate each and multiply" is wrong, and how to combine the rule with the chain rule.
Pure · Differentiation
The product rule
Differentiating a product of two functions, y = uv, as u'v + uv' — why the naive "differentiate each and multiply" is wrong, and how to combine the rule with the chain rule.
Why it works
When two functions are multiplied — say — the temptation is to differentiate each factor and multiply the results. That is wrong, and it is worth seeing why before learning the fix.A product measures an area. Picture a rectangle whose width is and height is , so its area is . Nudge a little: the width grows by a sliver and the height by a sliver . The area grows by three pieces — a tall thin strip down the side, a long thin strip along the top, and a tiny corner rectangle . That corner is the product of two small things, so it is vanishingly small compared with the strips and disappears in the limit. The change in area is therefore Divide by and let it shrink to zero: The reason "multiply the two derivatives" fails is now clear — it keeps only the corner and throws away the two strips that actually matter.
The rule, in the form to memorise: if then Differentiate the first times the second, plus the first times the derivative of the second. Set the work out by naming and , writing down and underneath, and assembling. Order does not matter — addition is commutative — but a tidy layout prevents slips.
Very often one factor is itself a composite, so you need the chain rule inside the product rule. For , take and ; then and (chain rule). Assemble and, where the examiner expects it, factorise the answer — a fully factorised derivative is what you need to solve later.