Pure · Integration
1 / 8
Indefinite integration (reversing differentiation)
What integration actually is — running differentiation backwards — and why the power rule for integration ("raise the power, divide by the new power") is the exact undo of the differentiation rule.
Pure · Integration
Indefinite integration (reversing differentiation)
What integration actually is — running differentiation backwards — and why the power rule for integration ("raise the power, divide by the new power") is the exact undo of the differentiation rule.
Why it works
Integration answers the reverse question. Differentiation asks: "here's a function — what's its gradient?" Integration asks: "here's a gradient — what function has it?"That's why the rule looks like differentiation run backwards. Differentiating does two things, in this order: multiply by the power, then knock the power down by one. To undo a two-step process you reverse both steps and their order — like taking off shoes and socks. So integrating does: raise the power by one first, then divide by the new power:
Why divide by the new power? Try skipping it: differentiate and you get — that factor of 4 appeared because the chain of differentiation multiplies by the power that was up there. If you wanted to end up at plain , you must pre-shrink by that factor: differentiates to exactly . The division isn't a ritual — it cancels, in advance, the multiplication that differentiation is about to do.
This gives you a superpower no other A-level topic has so cleanly: integration is self-checking. Differentiate your answer. If you don't get back the thing you integrated, you're wrong — no answer book needed.
One practical consequence: the rule only speaks the language of powers. So , and friends must be rewritten as powers (, ) before the rule can touch them. Most "integration errors" on these are really index-notation errors in disguise.