Number · Rounding & bounds
1 / 10
Upper and lower bounds
Why a rounded value hides half a unit of uncertainty each way, why the upper bound is a strict "less than", how truncation differs, and how to pick the right bounds when calculating — the ÷ and − traps included.
Number · Rounding & bounds
Upper and lower bounds
Why a rounded value hides half a unit of uncertainty each way, why the upper bound is a strict "less than", how truncation differs, and how to pick the right bounds when calculating — the ÷ and − traps included.
Why it works
A measurement of "45 cm to the nearest cm" doesn't mean 45.000… — it means the true length landed somewhere that rounds to 45. Everything from up to (but not including) does that, so the error interval is— half the rounding unit each way. Nearest 10 ⇒ ; nearest 0.1 ⇒ . The unit being halved is the rounding step, not 1.
Why the top is and not . itself rounds up to 46, so it isn't in the interval — but everything below it is, no matter how close. That's why the upper bound is stated as with a strict inequality: there's no "last number before 45.5" (44.9, 45.49, 45.499… never finish). Writing the UB as 45.49 or "45.4 recurring" is the classic mark-loser: use the clean half-unit value and let the carry the meaning.
Truncation cuts, rounding balances. A value truncated to 8.4 had its tail chopped, not rounded — anything from up to truncates to 8.4, so the interval is : the stated value is the bottom, and the whole step (not half) sits above it.
Calculating with bounds: push everything the same way. To make a result as BIG as possible, make everything that increases it big and everything that decreases it small:
- Multiply / add: UB × UB, UB + UB for the maximum.
- Divide: maximum of is
- Subtract: maximum of is ; the
Reason it out each time ("what makes this biggest?") rather than memorising the table; the reasoning is what the E-marks want.
"To a suitable degree of accuracy." Compute the UB and LB of the answer; quote only the figures they AGREE on. If and , both round to 3, so the answer is 3 (1 s.f.) — any more precision would be pretending to know digits the measurement can't support.